The U.S. Supreme Court just threw a wrench into one of Democrats’ favorite behind- the-scenes games: drawing district maps based on race. And suddenly, some of the loudest voices against “racism” are… not thrilled, screaming phrases like “Jim Crow” and (as usual) “it’s an end of democracy” because they can’t draw their racist maps.

The ruling, which struck down Louisiana’s congressional map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, reinforces a pretty straightforward idea: voters aren’t interchangeable pieces sorted by skin color. But critics on the left are warning of chaos, claiming minority representation took a hit.

Cue the irony.

As conservative commentator Kurt Schlichter put it:

Do you support individual military members being able to opt out of getting the COVID vaccine?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from SteveGruber.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

“The Supreme Court just said that you can’t gerrymander by race and all the people who claim not to be racist are really angry that they can’t be racist.”

For years, race-based mapping was defended as necessary to ensure “fair” representation. But the Court’s majority opinion signals that using race as a primary factor in drawing districts crosses a constitutional line. That’s a problem now for Democratic states that have leaned heavily on racial data to engineer “safe” districts.

The decision is causing the left to threaten to redraw their own maps before the upcoming elections (as if they haven’t already been working on doing that).