The Democratic field for President was comprised of six women, five people of color, an American Indian, and a gay mayor.
And Dems selected the old white guy who’s pushing 80 and who has made remarks and done things that have offended every ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Now the old white guy selects a female person of color who was roundly rejected by the Dem voters, and we are supposed to view it as a “historic moment!”
How so?
Believe it or not, Kamala Harris represents one of three wings of the increasingly fractious Democratic Party.
She’s a creature of the Hillary Clinton wing, which is the opportunistic center of the Democrats (important point), lost the last election, and continues to seethe and guess what Joe Biden picked?
I'm thrilled to welcome @KamalaHarris to a historic Democratic ticket. She's already proven herself to be an incredible public servant and leader. And I know she’ll be a strong partner to @JoeBiden. Please join me in having her back and getting her elected. pic.twitter.com/cmtOO8Gqqv
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 11, 2020
She will get a big bounce from this, and then the air will go out of her balloon fairly soon. It’s all downhill from here. Facts are facts, and the public is going to learn them.
Kamala has all the charm of a snake pit viper while coming across as condescending, arrogant, and sanctimonious. Her likability quotient is zilch, just like Hillary. Most of the electorate will remain oblivious to her actual record, but the real lack of empathy and phoniness will be her Achilles heel.
Harris has been morally consistent for decades, beginning with trading sex for power by dating Willie Brown, who was 30 years her senior. With that power, she has promoted and supported baby murder, socialism, the slavery of high taxation, burning and looting, prisoner release, open borders for rapists and murderers for votes, the destruction of democracy with mail-in balloting, Russiagate treason, lockdowns for political reasons.
NEW!! DOWNLOAD OUR FREE PODCAST APP
Kamala also needs to explain how, as a prosecutor, she failed to act on priests accused of abusing kids but did put pot users in prison. She received donations from the archdiocese, ahem.
The “A” squad never runs against a strong incumbent. Only the politician with nothing to lose would fight a losing battle and waste their political mussel. This pair is a perfect example of this, Biden has aged out, and Harris is a nobody with tons of liabilities.
The base has been shut out entirely, despite their primary power and control of the “get out the vote” machine. The establishment hasn’t given them any of their demands. They’ve heard the doublespeak with HRC, and now they’ll see it with these two. The Dems have all but conceded.
Anyone with any political aspirations and a decent record is not going to jump onto a sinking ship in full mutiny.
Harris previously said she believed those women who came forward to allege what might most charitably be described as creepy behavior by Biden. Has anyone in the mainstream media bothered to ask her why she now feels comfortable as his running mate? Or are such questions asked only of Republicans?
Kamala and Joe say America is crying out for leadership. As I remember, America was crying out for leadership from the previous eight years also. It seems the cry has is draining the swamp, which Joe was a major part, but yet now he has found the answer for all the things he did know how to do before. Kamala’s point of view has changed more times than anyone can count. She couldn’t get enough of creating lies and accusations against then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh, she just got done doing the same with Biden, but he forgives her.
MORE NEWS: GA Mom Gets Life Sentence For Murder Of 4-Year-Old Daughter; Blames Medical Episode
The bottom line, the socialist left Democrats, are setting the stage for Biden to exit stage left, and Kamala to take over. They can implement their communist agenda after that. Funny how being an outright socialist-communist activist doesn’t seem to bother anyone anymore.
The question is, do you prefer a president who you dislike on a personal basis but is very effective at getting things done and making those who work for him tow their weight or one who gives nice teleprompter speeches, makes you think he is your friend and says one thing during the campaign and does something else after elected? It’s a simple choice. One says what he will do upfront and does it after being elected. The other will do whatever he is told regardless of campaign commitments.
See you in November.
This piece was written by Wayne Dupree on August 12, 2020. It originally appeared in WayneDupree.com and is used by permission.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Steve Gruber.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.