By Missy Crane | March 4, 2020

As Democrats spiral into massive panic-mode over the thought of Bernie Sanders winning the Dem nomination, they’re doing the unthinkable – they’re backing a candidate who literally suffers from dementia.

Joe Biden is the new “savior” of the Dem Party. This poor senile buffoon is tasked with saving the Dems from nominating a full-blown dusty communist who, if nominated, would help flip the House back to red in record time, increase the GOP senate seats and lose the WH to boot.

It’s literally “code red” panic time.

So, in order to try and pull this monumental task off, Biden is selling himself as old “Uncle Joe” a moderate friend to the working-class man.

RELATED: VIDEO: Biden Snaps at Group of Vets Confronting Him Over Iraq War Dead: “So is My Son!”

But good ol’ Uncle Joe – Grandpa Joe now – is not a “moderate.” Not at all. He’s actually quite a progressive.

Nearly all Dems are progressive, to be honest.

Joe is so far left, that conservative pundit Herman Cain says he’s actually a socialist.

I realize that Biden is not a socialist in any formal sense. He doesn’t identify as one. He doesn’t run around singing the praises of Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro. He never worked for the Socialist Workers Party like Sanders did. He never defended the Iranian hostage-taker, nor did he accuse the American hostages of being spies, like Sanders did.

In other words, Biden at least knows how to act the part of a sane, patriotic American.

But in terms of policy outcomes, how much difference would there really be between Biden and Sanders?

Both want to forgive student loans. Both want a much larger role for government in health care. Both want to raise taxes. Both want to commit the U.S. to fanciful climate pacts. Both would return us to the insane Iran nuclear deal. Both would reintroduce many regulations that Donald Trump has done away with.

Under either Biden or Sanders, it would be more difficult to produce and export U.S. energy resources, and it would be virtually impossible to drill offshore. Under either one, the military would be starved for funds.

Once you actually put a Democrat in office, the distinctions between the Democrat and a socialist are insignificant. [Western Journal]

Cain goes on to explain that the “Bernie” candidate and the “Biden” candidate would both try and expand the government as much as possible.

Both of these candidates also would deplete the military.

They would also support every regulation and tax that came down the pike but will attack “Wallstreet” every chance they get.

Cain says that electing a Democrat who is “not a socialist” really doesn’t give us results that are any different than electing the socialist. The only real restraint on either is what Congress will or will not allow.

Amen.

So, whatever you do, don’t elect a Democrat!

 

 

This piece originally appeared on WayneDupree.com and is used by permission.

Read more at WayneDupree.com:
Report: Harry Feeling “Emotional” and “Bittersweet” as He Finishes Final Duties as a Royal, Alone in Britain
[VIDEO] Donna Brazile Comes Unglued During Interview Tells GOP Chairwoman to “Go to Hell”
Flashback Report: Obama Didn’t Declare H1N1 a ‘National Emergency’ Until 1,000 Americans Were Dead

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Steve Gruber.