After what feels like forever in political years, Russiagate, the fake collusion narrative where Democrats tried to undermine Donald Trump and derail his presidency, might finally waddle its way into the highest courtroom in the land.

According to Just the News, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has been asked to weigh a case arguing that federal officials should be suable for alleged bogus FISA warrants tied to the infamous 2016 Russia election-interference probe.

This is the Carter Page lawsuit, where Page, a former foreign policy adviser to President Trump, “became the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation into possible Russian election interference known as ‘Crossfire Hurricane’,” says Just the News.

Page’s attorney argues that the FBI secured four surveillance warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court targeting Page, but said applications were riddled with errors, omissions, and misstatements that the Bureau later determined undermined the required showing of probable cause.

Page is going after former FBI Director James Comey and other officials he argues helped launch a politically fueled probe built on shaky paperwork and – as we all know – opposition research (Steele dossier) paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Page argues the errors trampled his rights and wrecked his rep, and now SCOTUS might have to decide whether or not some corrupt Democrats (Comey, McCabe, Strzok,, etc.) will finally have to answer for it. Their decision about whether to take up the case is supposed to happen in March.

If the justices agree to hear the case, it could mark the first real test of whether federal officials can be held personally accountable for one of the most explosive political investigations (targeting of a presidential administration) in modern history. After years of headlines, hearings, and finger-pointing, Russiagate may finally face something it has largely avoided: actual judicial scrutiny.