The jury ultimately split 11-1, leading to a mistrial after roughly 38 hours of deliberations over seven days.

Three female jurors appeared in a group interview with NBC10 Boston recently: Paula Devlin (does work for a defense contractor), foreperson Roni Carlson (former elementary school teacher) and Kellie Farina (chef for a senior center) who are now “friends for life.”

Carlson told NBC10 Boston the holdout actually acknowledged having reasonable doubt. She thought that meant they had finally reached a verdict and began filling out the paperwork. Then, according to Carlson, he ultimately refused to vote not guilty by reason of insanity.

Then there is Kellie Farina who wasn’t exactly unbiased from the start after listening to the prosecutor’s opening statement, painting her as being harsh, heartless, unprofessional and lacking compassion. She also said that no one had any character witnesses that Clancy was a bad mother. Farina also incredulously said she was glad that Clancy’s attorney (Kevin Reddington) didn’t waste any additional time with a “bunch of more medical BS” instead of talking about “who Lindsay is and what her life was like.” And she called the defendant’s attorney “Kevin.”

The women emphasized that Clancy was a good mother and repeatedly reached out to others for help. Their interviews focused heavily on sympathy for Clancy, with far less attention given to the three children who lost their lives.

Juror Paula Devlin didn’t mince words about the lone holdout in the jury.

“He was very arrogant,” she said, claiming he disregarded information and wouldn’t listen to other jurors. The foreperson even sent the judge a note complaining that one juror wasn’t properly applying the reasonable-doubt standard. She added that he didn’t spend enough time looking at any of the evidence that was available to them.

But another female juror is offering at least a partial defense of the holdout. She said in a different interview (anonymously) there were “big personalities” in the jury room and said he wasn’t the only juror initially unwilling to consider the other side. She herself initially leaned toward finding Clancy guilty before changing her view during deliberations. She also erroneously said, “And there’s no way she’s getting that help in prison.”

🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: A fourth female juror just went public and said the singular male holdout was being pressured to acquit Lindsay Clancy since the FIRST DAY of deliberations

This same juror says she caved to the mob, going from GUILTY to NOT GUILTY 😠

“That person — the… pic.twitter.com/ImDHnunqeJ

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 9, 2026

The holdout has not publicly told his side of the story. And prosecutors have not yet announced whether Clancy will face a second trial.