Why is it that Democrats continue to support policies allowing biological men in women’s bathrooms and locker rooms? Why are they fighting to keep sexually explicit material in children’s school libraries? Why do they support drag queens reading stories to elementary children?

The answer seems disturbingly clear: they’re defending the indefensible. When you look at what today’s Democrats are willing to promote and protect, it’s hard to conclude anything other than they’ve lost all moral compass.

The latest example of this is the response by a judge to a school board in Colorado who responded to concerns from parents, voters, and taxpayers about the presence of sexually explicit and age-inappropriate content in school libraries. They voted to remove certain books.

Enter federal Judge Charlotte Sweeney, (appointed by former President Joe Biden) who has ruled, with a preliminary injunction, that the aforementioned Colorado school board cannot remove sexually explicit, profane, and “transgender” books from school libraries because the board is conservative, which she claims is unconstitutional, according to the Daily Signal.

Yes, she actually said that. Here’s what she wrote: “Other than pretextual declarations, at this stage, there simply is no reason to believe that the books were removed because of vulgarity, age-inappropriateness, or for legitimate pedagogical [teaching] concerns; the board’s own emails strongly suggest that the book removal was motivated by the directors’ ‘commitment to conservative values. The court questions what could be more partisan or political than removing books to further the board’s self-described conservative values.”

So, to recap: a democratically elected school board, acting on the concerns of its constituents, attempts to remove books it deems inappropriate for children. But a federal judge steps in, declaring that such actions are unconstitutional because they stem from conservative values.

According to Dems, it’s not always about the explicit content of the books – what really matters is who’s offended by them. If a conservative parent objects, they’re labeled a book-burner.

But when a Democrat judge’s personal politics come into play? That’s perfectly acceptable – especially when the judge in question, Charlotte Sweeney, who is a lesbian in addition to being a Biden appointee, makes what looks like a biased decision. Then it’s no problem at all.