The leftist media stenographers for the democrat party are not even embarrassed anymore when they get caught writing fake stories to try to take President Trump down. They follow no journalism standards and rarely source their stories anymore. 

That allows them to write totally made-up stories or just find some anti-Trumpers who used to work in government to make up stories for them.

We can expect lots of fake Trump fake stories coming out between now and the election because the dems are in panic mode about Trump’s current momentum and the total lack of enthusiasm to vote for Biden.

Such is the case with the fake Atlantic story about Trump saying derogatory things about the military during a time when he was supposed to visit fallen American soldiers in a cemetery near Paris, France. Apparently, according to the leftist media stenographers, Trump didn’t want to get his hair wet in the rain and called the soldiers “losers and suckers” because they lost their battle and died.

The story, written about something that supposedly happened two years ago, was debunked within 24 hours but Twitter, with not much else going on over the weekend, kept pushing the story for days. They ignored the actual sourcing of real people who said it never happened, the proof that the trip was called off because of weather and even anti-Trumper John Bolton’s denial of ever hearing Trump say anything like that all day.

When do you think the country should re-open and get back to work?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from SteveGruber.com and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

The lying democrats rely on ignorant people in order to push their policies and their media stories. As Thomas Paine said, “Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it.”

Ain’t that the truth. 

The Atlantic story is one of those stories, like the pee dossier story, which makes you laugh when you read it because it’s so absurd.

You’ll also laugh when you read where The Atlantic got their information. Here it is, in order of how the story was written, showcasing their great journalist technique of sourcing information…

…multiple sources…

…according to four people with firsthand knowledge of the discussion that day…

…in a conversation with senior staff members…

…according to three sources with direct knowledge of this event…(what happened to the fourth person???)

…according to witnesses…

…these sources and others quoted in this article, spoke on condition of anonymity…

…according to sources with knowledge of the president’s views…

…according to three sources with direct knowledge of his views…

…according to sources with knowledge of this visit….

…one of (John) Kelly’s friends…. (ah, we’ve ALMOST get a real source here!)

…according to eyewitnesses after a White House briefing…

…one officer with firsthand knowledge of Trump’s views…

…several observers…

Wow, wasn’t that impressive?

This shows that the Atlantic obviously made up the whole story or they used liars who don’t want to go on record because they’d be challenged. There is no reason for the Atlantic to “protect” them. It’s not like they are undercover FBI agents or are holding nuclear codes or something. 

So nice try, democrats. 

We’ll be here, waiting for your next BS Trump story to ridicule.