By Missy Crane | November 28, 2019

I think the FBI could spend the next 100-years investigating Hillary’s emails and keep finding more and more “missing emails.” That is what an absolute mess her email scandal truly is.

And to think this woman is not prison for this, while people like Roger Stone faces 50-years behind bars for silly process crimes is infuriating and goes to show how rich and powerful Democrats can get away with murder.

A new report from the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch reveals that the FBI has found MORE of Hillary’s emails.

What a CHAMP: [VIDEO] Pro-Trump Tim Allen Goes Into the Lions Den on ABC’s ‘The View’ and Shreds Political Correctness Like a Boss!

Amazing isn’t it? Yet this woman is free to waddle around without a care in the world giving speeches and plugging her stupid books.

Do you support individual military members being able to opt out of getting the COVID vaccine?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from SteveGruber.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton put it best when he said, “It is astonishing news that the FBI mysteriously found more Clinton emails.  Were they on Anthony Weiner’s laptop?  At James Comey’s house? Or on Peter Strzok’s cell phone? This disturbing development further highlights how the fix was in on the Clinton email scandal and why a criminal investigation needs to be reopened by Attorney General Barr.”

We agree with Mr. Fitton. We want to see a new investigation as well. Will that happen? Who knows, but until then, we’ll keep sharing the information.

Judicial Watch today released a court filing that reveals the FBI found more Clinton emails it recently turned over to the State Department for review. In the November 15, 2019 filing, the State Department informs the court that the FBI located additional Clinton emails that potentially had not been previously released:

[T]he Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) recently sent [the State Department] additional documents as part of the ongoing inter-agency consultation process in connection with other FOIA litigation. [The State Department] is working to determine whether that set of documents includes any responsive, non-duplicative agency records that have not already been processed. [The State Department] will promptly update [Judicial Watch] and the Court once that initial review is complete.
The court ordered joint status report was filed in response to Judicial Watch’s May 6, 2015, FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00687)). Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit seeks all emails sent and received by Hillary Clinton and other records about her non-governmental email account.

Production of all Clinton emails concluded more than a year ago.  Throughout the two plus years of processing and production, more and more emails would appear in addition to the 55,000 pages Clinton turned over to the State Department in December 2014.  The FBI uncovered 72,000 pages of documents Clinton attempted to delete or did not otherwise disclose. Previously requested, the FBI was only able to recover or find approximately 5,000, including classified material, of the 33,000 government emails Clinton removed and tried to destroy.  Earlier this year, Judicial Watch announced that it received 756 pages of emails that were among the materials Clinton tried to delete or destroy, several of which were classified and were transmitted over her unsecure, non-“state.gov” email system.    Now again, it appears the FBI has uncovered more Clinton email documents. [Judicial Watch]

This piece originally appeared in WayneDupree.com and is used by permission.

Read more at WayneDupree.com:

Report: Chick-fil-A Funding Pro-Gay Groups, Pro-Abortion Groups and Progressive Millennial Groups
Recent Polls Send Ana Navarro Over The Edge, Faces Brutal Backlash After Hurling Racist Insults at Black Trump Supporters
Opinion: If Impeachment Goes to Senate John Roberts Will Have to Step Down as ‘Chief Justice’

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Steve Gruber.